Elon Musk Sues Lego, Nestlé, Colgate, and More Over Advertising on X!

Elon Musk continues to press on. The platform X has recently expanded its lawsuit against what it deems an illegal advertising boycott. Initially filed in August 2024, the lawsuit targeted major companies such as CVS Health, Mars, Twitch, and Orsted. However, X has now escalated the matter by adding Nestlé, Colgate-Palmolive, Shell, Lego, Pinterest, Tyson Foods, and Abbott Laboratories to the list of defendants. According to Musk, these brands allegedly coordinated a massive withdrawal of their advertisements from X, resulting in substantial financial losses.

A Tale of “Brand Safety” Turning into a Clash

The conflict originated from Musk’s decisions after his acquisition of Twitter in 2022. He scaled back moderation, reinstated banned accounts, and altered the rules regarding sensitive content. This alarmed some brands, which preferred not to display their ads next to potentially controversial content. This is where the World Federation of Advertisers comes into play, an organization that advocates for advertisers’ interests and leads the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), an initiative meant to ensure a “clean” advertising environment.

Read  Unlock the Latest AirPods Pro 2 Features with New Update!

The problem, according to X, is that the WFA and GARM allegedly pressured brands to slash their advertising budgets on the platform, aiming to compel Musk to adopt stricter policies. This sort of disguised boycott reportedly deprived X of billions in advertising revenue.

X Seeks Redress and Takes Legal Action

Understandably, Musk was not pleased. Not only did he publicly criticize the brands that withdrew, but he also initiated legal action. His claim: while advertisers have the right to decide where to spend their money, coordinating to penalize a platform amounts to antitrust behavior. In essence, X accuses the involved companies of manipulating the market by forming a sort of advertising cartel. Quite a claim indeed.

X is demanding compensation for damages and aims to prevent such practices in the future. Meanwhile, some brands are gradually returning to X, such as Amazon, which has resumed its investments, and even Apple, which is reconsidering its investment returns on X. Interestingly, this comes as Musk grows closer to the Trump administration, which could influence major companies’ decisions.

Read  Shocking Test: Will This iPhone Survive Playing Frozen?

What Now?

For now, the WFA defends itself by stating that GARM never intended to sabotage X and was merely looking to protect the brands’ images. Moreover, the initiative was discontinued shortly after the first lawsuit was filed. The targeted companies have yet to publicly respond, but this legal battle could drag on for a while.

It remains to be seen whether Musk will prevail or if X will continue to struggle with reduced advertising. In the meantime, the tension between Musk and the advertisers shows no signs of easing.

4.1/5 - (34 votes)

Leave a Comment

Partages